Jason Whitlock makes huge U-turn in Caitlin Clark v Angel Reese debate

Angel Reese has a ‘real case’ to be crowned WNBA Rookie of the Year ahead of Caitlin Clark, says Jason Whitlock.

Whitlock has embarked on a number of tirades about Reese of late, most recently claiming the Chicago Sky forward’s apparent record for having the most ‘double-doubles’ in the WNBA is simply ‘made up’.

The conservative sports commentator also branded her ‘overrated’ in the past before taking back that criticism after she inspired Chicago’s victory over Clark and the Indiana Fever last month.

Clark, who left college basketball as the all-time leading scorer in NCAA history, instantly became the favorite for this year’s Rookie of the Year prize after transitioning to the WNBA and joining Indiana.

Angel Reese has a 'real case' to be crowned WNBA Rookie of the Year, says Jason Whitlock

 

Angel Reese has a ‘real case’ to be crowned WNBA Rookie of the Year, says Jason Whitlock

Yet while the Fever sensation is averaging more points per game (16 compared to 13.2), Reese has been equally impressive in her debut campaign for the Sky and currently leads the way in the league for rebounds with 11.8 per game.

As a result, Whitlock admits the battle for Rookie of the Year is now ‘a lot closer than people think’.

‘There’s going to be a legitimate case for Angel Reese to be rookie of the year, and I’m going to say this for a couple of different reasons,’ the controversial podcast host said this week.

‘Caitlin Clark’s plus/minus is one of the worst in the league. I think out of 145 or 146 players she ranks about 140 in plus/minus. A couple of her teammates are down there as well.

‘Caitlin Clark is leading the league in turnovers and Caitlin Clark is shooting 33 percent from three-point range, and she goes through these scoring droughts during the game that hamper her team. This is a woman that led the NCAA in scoring two years in a row, is the all-time leading scorer… she is not an effective scorer in the WNBA.

‘I know she’s averaging 16 points a game, but I’ve watched every game. She’s a very inefficient shooter, she’s got the long 27-foot three-pointer, that’s in her bag. Occasionally she gets to the rim and gets a lay-up.

Whitlock has performed a huge U-turn after previously criticizing the Chicago Sky rookie

Whitlock has performed a huge U-turn after previously criticizing the Chicago Sky rookie

 

The conservative sports commentator believes Caitlin Clark is not an 'effective' shooter

 

The conservative sports commentator believes Caitlin Clark is not an ‘effective’ shooter

Reese set a WNBA record for double-doubles in her most recent outing for Chicago

Reese set a WNBA record for double-doubles in her most recent outing for Chicago

‘But between the turnovers, the plus-minus, missing 70 percent of three-pointers she shoots… Caitlin Clark has been great box-office, she’s a great player. But on the other ledger, Angel Reese… I don’t buy the double-double thing at all. That’s a bit of a gimmick and just a stat that they brought out of nowhere.

‘But she’s leading the league in rebounds. That’s a real stat, that’s a real contribution. She’s doing it as a rookie. This Rookie of the Year race is closer than a lot of people think.’

On Tuesday night, Reese became the first player in the history of the WNBA to put up 10 consecutive double-doubles in a single season, surpassing future Hall of Famer Candace Parker’s record nine double-doubles in 2015.

Advertisement

But Whitlock was not convinced that stat holds much weight.

‘Angel Reese’s most consecutive double-double WNBA record is just made up,’ he said.

‘No one knows who had the previous record. This has never been a standard in the NBA. Guys average a double-double.’

In a surprising twist ahead of the 2024 Paris Olympics, Simone Biles, the celebrated American gymnast, has reportedly called for the expulsion of basketball star Brittney Griner from the U.S. sports delegation. Biles allegedly argued that Griner’s actions, particularly her stance during the national anthem, are incompatible with representing the country on such a global stage.

 

 

This development comes amidst heightened scrutiny over athletes political and social statements. Griner, who has previously voiced her opposition to the national anthem, faced backlash for her stance, which some critics argue undermines the team’s unity and patriotism. Despite this. Griner has remained steadfast in her beliefs, which she views as an exercise of her First Amendment rights.

 

 

Biles, known for her advocacy of mental health and athletes’ rights appears to be drawing a line on the issue of national representation. Her position suggests a belief that representing the US at the Olympics should align with a specific set of values, including respect for national symbols. This sentiment reflects a broader debate in sports about the balance between personal expression and collective representation. 

Griner’s situation is further complicated by her recent high-profile return to the U.S.

 

after being detained in Russia. Her ordeal, involving accusations of drug possession, sparked a diplomatic row and added a layer of complexity to her public image. While many supported her return and recovery, others remain critical of her political views and their potential impact on the team’s cohesion. 

 

The controversy highlights a growing divide in American sports over the role of athletes as both competitors and cultural figures. It raises questions about the extent to which personal beliefs should influence an athlete’s eligibility to represent their country, particularly in events as globally significant as the Olympics.

 

Biles call if substantiated, could set a significant precedent for future U.S. delegations. It underscores the challenges athletes face in balancing their personal convictions with the expectations of their roles as national representatives. As the Olympics approach, it remains to be seen how the U.S. Olympic Committee and other governing bodies will navigate this complex issue.

The debate over Griner’s participation, framed by Biles stance, could also influence public opinion on athlete activism, potentially shaping policies and attitudes towards expressions of dissent within sports. The outcome of this controversy may have lasting implications for how American athletes engage with social and political issues, both domestically and on the international stage

Advertisement

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *